Archive for the 'News' Category
January 23, 2014
Steve Szentesi
Kevin Wright (Davis LLP)
Extract from a chapter to be published in CLEBC
Annual Review of Law & Practice – 2014
The following are several of the key competition law private action cases in Canada in 2013 from our forthcoming chapter in CLEBC’s Annual Review of Law & Practice – 2014. For the first three posts (misleading advertising, mergers and Investment Canada Act, and civil and criminal matters) see: here, here and here. Tomorrow I’ll post our final update of key competition law developments from last year: trade and professional associations, new Competition Bureau guidelines and other developments.
********************
Joint Procurement of Oilfield Services
On June 14, 2013, the Alberta Court of Appeal unanimously reversed a controversial trial judgment holding that two competing oil and gas producers had illegally conspired contrary to the pre-2010 version of section 45 of the Act (i.e., the criminal conspiracy provision) by agreeing to use one supplier of certain oil field services to the exclusion of the plaintiff: 321665 Alberta Ltd. v. Husky Oil Operations Ltd., 2013 ABCA 221. On January 16, 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the plaintiff’s application for leave to appeal.
January 22, 2014
A new C.D. Howe Institute report, entitled “Full Throttle: Reforming Canada’s Aviation Policy”, looks at ways to lower the cost of air travel in Canada and make the Canadian airline industry more competitive.
January 22, 2014
Steve Szentesi
Kevin Wright (Davis LLP)
Extract from a chapter to be published in CLEBC
Annual Review of Law & Practice – 2014
The following are some of the key civil and criminal competition law developments in Canada in 2013 (late 2012 to early 2014) from our forthcoming chapter in CLEBC’s Annual Review of Law & Practice – 2014.
January 21, 2014
Steve Szentesi
Kevin Wright (Davis LLP)
Extract from a chapter to be published in CLEBC
Annual Review of Law & Practice – 2014
The following are some of the key merger and Investment Canada Act developments in Canada in 2013 (late 2012 to early 2014) from our forthcoming chapter in CLEBC’s Annual Review of Law & Practice – 2014.
Do you need contest rules/precedents
for a Canadian contest?
We offer many types of Canadian contest/sweepstakes law precedents and forms (i.e., Canadian contest/sweepstakes law precedents to run common types of contests in Canada). These include precedents for random draw contests (i.e., where winners are chosen by random draw), skill contests (e.g., essay, photo or other types of contests where entrants submit content that is judged to enter the contest or for additional entries), trip contests and more. Also available are individual Canadian contest/sweepstakes precedents, including short rules (“mini-rules”), long rules, winner releases and a Canadian contest law checklist. For more information or to order, see: Canadian Contest Law Forms/Precedents. If you would like to discuss legal advice in relation to your contest or other promotion, contact us: Contact.
********************
I’ve been working on a fair number of contests lately. Sometimes they appear deceptively simple, but in fact are fairly highly regulated including a small tangle of modern (e.g., the federal Competition Act and social media sites’ terms of use) and antiquated laws (e.g., the sometimes tortuous illegal lottery provisions of the Criminal Code).
January 20, 2014
Steve Szentesi
Kevin Wright (Davis LLP)
Extract from a chapter to be published in CLEBC
Annual Review of Law & Practice – 2014
2013 was once again a busy year for Canadian competition and foreign investment law, administration and policy, including the June 12, 2013 announcement that then Interim Commissioner John Pecman had been appointed to a five year term as Commissioner of Competition, the head of the federal Competition Bureau.
January 16, 2014
Mark Katz and John Bodrug (Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg in Toronto) have published a quite good new note on the risks of managing document creation in light of a merger review, entitled: “Compliance Alert: The Importance of Managing Document Creation – Update on the Bazaarvoice/PowerReviews Transaction”. A good note on discussions and document creation in light of an impending merger. Introduction:
January 15, 2014
Earlier today, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that Apple Inc. had agreed to refund consumers USD $32.5 million, under a proposed consent order, in relation to alleged failures to adequately disclose kids’ mobile app charges.