Archive for the 'Competition Bureau' Category
March 3, 2014
It seems to me that competition law issues are in the media a lot more over the past few years. And so they should be (ok that’s my, slightly, biased view as a competition lawyer), given that competition affects virtually every decision Canadian consumers make – from buying groceries, to filling up the car, to cell phone plans to choice of where to buy their beer (a recent bugaboo for me of late, the liquor retailing debate).
March 3, 2014
Earlier today, following its recent Global Forum on Competition, the OECD has published an interesting new report with international contributions on corruption and competition entitled Fighting Corruption and Promoting Competition. This new report includes submissions from Canada (the Competition Bureau) as well as a number of other leading jurisdictions including the United States.
February 25, 2014
Guest post by Burt Braverman
(Davis Wright Tremaine LLP)
Professional and trade associations contribute to the public welfare in many ways, including disseminating information, promoting research, developing standards and spurring industry initiatives. But such associations generally are composed primarily of actual or potential competitors, and sometimes seemingly benign conduct—including even actions intended to promote the ethical conduct of an association’s members—can have untoward consequences for third parties, association members and the association itself, including potential antitrust liability. The recent announcement by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) of consent decrees entered into by two professional associations—the first representing music teachers, and the other representing legal support services providers—highlights this risk and the need for professional and trade associations to guard against their codes of ethics, and also their policies, standards, rules and procedures, being co-opted for potentially anticompetitive purposes.
February 25, 2014
In an interesting and important decision issued by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on February 21st, the Court has now imposed a $500,000 civil administrative monetary penalty (“AMP”) against Rogers for failing to have performed adequate and proper testing in some Canadian markets for performance claims made in relation to its Chatr Wireless brand (see: Canada (Commissioner of Competition) v. Chatr Wireless Inc., 2014 ONSC 1146).
February 20, 2014
In what can only be called a sobering reminder earlier today of the importance of not obstructing an ongoing criminal antitrust investigation, the U.S. Department of Justice announced that a former auto parts supplier executive has agreed to plead guilty for obstructing the U.S. authorities’ ongoing auto parts cartel investigation and serve jail time.
February 20, 2014
Earlier today, and close on the heels of the announcement of winners in the Government’s 700 MHz spectrum auction yesterday (see: here), the CRTC has announced that it is launching a new public consultation on the state of competition in the wholesale mobile wireless services market. According to the CRTC’s announcement, it is interested in hearing from Canadians on: (i) the state of the market for wholesale mobile wireless services (including wholesale roaming and wholesale tower sharing); (ii) the impact that the wholesale mobile wireless services market has on the retail market; and (iii) whether greater regulatory oversight would be appropriate if it were to find that the wholesale mobile wireless services market is not sufficiently competitive.
February 20, 2014
As part of its upcoming Global Forum on Competition, the OECD has published an interesting new report on competition in the pharmaceuticals sector entitled Competition Issues in the Distribution of Pharmaceuticals. This new report, with submissions from Canada (the Competition Bureau) and United States (DoJ and FTC), includes discussions on a variety of competition/antitrust topics related to the distribution of brand and generic pharmaceticals.
February 18, 2014
Earlier today, the Competition Bureau announced Its most recent new competition advocacy initiative, relating to the regulation of the Toronto taxi industry (see: Competition Bureau Provides Submission to City of Toronto’s Taxicab Industry Review). The Bureau also issued a companion Submission by the Commissioner of Competition to the City of Toronto Taxicab Industry Review.
The key recommendations made in the Bureau’s newest competition advocacy initiative include Issuing new taxi licenses in Toronto and amending regulations to allow new cost-savings software applications to pay for motor vehicle transport services.
Templates/precedents and checklists to run promotional contests in Canada
Templates/precedents and checklists to comply with Canadian anti-spam law (CASL)
