CANADIAN CONTEST (SWEEPSTAKES) LAW
“Section 74.06 of the Competition Act is a civil provision. It prohibits any promotional contest that does not disclose the number and approximate value of prizes, the area or areas to which they relate and any important information relating to the chances of winning such as the odds of winning. It also stipulates that the distribution of prizes cannot be unduly delayed and that participants be selected or prizes distributed on the basis of skill or on a random basis.
If a court determines that a person has engaged in conduct contrary to section 74.06, it may order the person not to engage in such conduct, to publish a corrective notice and/or to pay an administrative monetary penalty of up to $750,000 in the case of a first time occurrence by an individual and $10,000,000 in the case of a first time occurrence by a corporation. For subsequent orders, the penalties increase to a maximum of $1,000,000 in the case of an individual and $15,000,000 in the case of a corporation.”
Promotional Contests Enforcement Guidelines)
CANADIAN CONTEST RULES & FORMS
Need contest rules and forms for a Canadian Contest?: I offer a selection of Canadian contest rules and forms for common types of Canadian contests. For more information see: Contest Forms.
Given that the improper operation of a promotional contest can lead to civil or criminal liability, it is important to review proposed promotional contests for compliance with key federal and provincial laws.
Operating contests in Canada typically includes the preparation of “short rules” (for point-of-purchase materials), “long rules” (or “official rules” as they are sometimes referred to), winner releases, a skill-testing question and a review creative materials for misleading advertising compliance.
The following discusses these key aspects and some other considerations that can arise in connection with the operation of contests in Canada.
The Competition Act largely requires that certain disclosure be made when conducting “any contest, lottery, game of chance or skill, or mixed chance and skill, or otherwise [disposing] of any product or other benefit …”
Key Competition Act requirements include: (i) disclosing the number and approximate value of prizes, (ii) disclosing the area (or areas) to which they relate and (iii) any fact that may materially affect the odds of winning. The Act also prohibits contest organizers from “unduly delaying” the award of prizes.
Based on these requirements, most contest organizers provide a short version of a contest’s terms (frequently referred to as “short rules”) in all point-of-purchase materials regardless of media (i.e., in all print, online and other electronic media), with a full version of the contest rules available on request and commonly posted on the sponsor’s website. Point-of-purchase disclosure (short rules) commonly includes both the required statutory disclosure and other key contest elements.
While short, and usually straightforward, it is important that the mandatory statutory disclosure be drafted precisely and correctly. It is also important that the timing for the launch of a contest and accompanying promotional materials ensure that the necessary disclosure is included in point-of-purchase and similar marketing materials where entrants first see a contest promoted.
General Misleading Advertising Provisions
In addition to specific rules relating to promotional contests, the “general misleading advertising” provisions of the Competition Act also apply to contests, as with any other advertising or marketing in Canada.
In this respect, sections 52 and 74.01 of the Competition Act prohibit materially false or misleading representations to the public for the purpose of promoting products or any business interest. The potential penalties for contravening these provisions can be severe and include civil fines of up to $750,000 (for individuals) and $10 million (for corporations) and court orders to cease the conduct, publish corrective notices or compensate consumers.
As such, it is important that creative materials be reviewed for misleading advertising compliance before a contest is launched.
Other Competition Act Rules
In addition to the standalone promotional contest provision, the Competition Act also contains several other specific provisions regulating contests operated in the context of (a) telemarketing (section 52.1) and (b) prize notices (section 53).
Section 52.1 of the Act prohibits telemarketers from conducting contests where (a) the delivery of a prize (or other benefit) is or is represented to be conditional on prior payment or (b) adequate and fair disclosure is not made of the number and approximate value of prizes, the area or areas to which they relate and the odds of winning.
Section 53 of the Act prohibits prize notices sent by electronic or regular mail that give the general impression that a recipient has won (or will win) a prize and requires a payment (or incurring another cost) unless the recipient actually wins the prize or benefit and certain disclosure and other requirements are satisfied by the sender.
These include adequate and fair disclosure of the number and approximate value of prizes, regional allocation of prizes and any fact within the sender’s knowledge that materially affects the chances of winning (i.e., odds of winning). In addition, the distribution of prizes cannot be unreasonably delayed and there are requirements for the selection of participants and distribution of prizes.
Persons that violate section 53 are liable to fines, on summary conviction, of up to $200,000 and/or imprisonment for up to one year and, on indictment, to fines in the discretion of the court and/or imprisonment for up to 14 years. Several due diligence defences are, however, available under this offence.
INTERNET CONTESTS & PROMOTIONS
The Competition Bureau also takes the position that the promotional contest provisions of the Competition Act, as well as the general misleading advertising provisions, apply to Internet marketing and advertising. In this regard, the Bureau’s view is that special considerations may apply online to ensure that the required statutory disclosure for contests is met:
“Pursuant to section 74.06 of the Act, in contests designed to promote a product or business interest, adequate and fair disclosure must be made of certain information, including facts which materially affect the chances of winning. … The Bureau takes the position that all required disclosures must be displayed in such a way that they are likely to be read. In the context of representations made on-line, what is considered adequately displayed will depend on the format and design of the Web site. For example, a notice of a contest should not require readers to take an active step, such as sending an e-mail or placing a phone call, in order to obtain the required information. The Bureau does not consider clicking on a clearly labelled hyperlink as being an ‘active step.’”
In addition to the promotional contest provisions in the Competition Act, the federal Criminal Code also governs the operation of contests in Canada. Section 206 contains certain lottery related offences. Generally, the Criminal Code makes it a criminal offence to operate illegal lotteries, as defined and set out by the offences under section 206.
At common law, illegal lotteries had been defined as consisting of: (i) a prize, (ii) chance and (iii) consideration (i.e., something of value provided by contestants as a condition for eligibility or participation). These core elements of illegal lotteries are now codified (although inconsistently) in section 206 of the Code.
Based on these illegal lottery offences, it is necessary for contest organizers to structure their contests in Canada to avoid violating the Criminal Code. As such, contest organizers commonly remove either the consideration element (e.g., providing a “no purchase necessary” entry option), the chance element (e.g., including a multiple-step mathematical question as a condition of winning) or both in order to remove a promotional contest from the scope of the illegal lottery provisions of the Criminal Code.
It is important to note, however, that the illegal lottery offences under the Criminal Code are more complex than described above. As such, if planning to run a contest that deviates from commonly run types of contests, it is prudent to get some advice as to whether any possible criminal law issues may arise.
“The private rights and remedies growing out of prize winning contests are discussed in an annotation in (1963), 87 A.L.R. (2d) 649 et seq. Several cases are cited in which the principle is accepted that a contract comes into existence by the promoter’s offer and the contestant’s performance of the act required in the offer. At p. 661, the following statement is made: ‘The general rule of the law of contracts that where an offer or promise for an act is made, the only acceptance of the offer that is necessary is the performance of the act, applies to prize-winning contests. The promoter of such a contest, by making public the conditions and rules of the contest, makes an offer, and if before the offer is withdrawn another person acts upon it, the promoter is bound to perform his promise.’”
(Group Against Smokers’ Pollution Inc. v. Manitoba (Lotteries Licensing Board),  6 W.W.R. 367, citing a U.S. annotation: (1963), 87 A.L.R. (2d) 649)
In addition to the requirements of the Competition Act and Criminal Code, contests have also been held to be contracts. In particular, offers made by promoters have been held, when fulfilled by contestants, to be legally binding contracts.
This means that contests are governed by the common law of contract and that contests can establish contractual relations between promoters and contestants, which, if breached or unfulfilled, can lead to liability for breach of contract (or allow promoters to avoid liability, depending on a particular contest’s terms).
As such, in addition to ensuring compliance with applicable statutory requirements, it is important that contest terms and conditions are carefully and precisely drafted to reduce potential contractual liability.
This includes a careful review of short rules, long rules and winner release documentation to ensure that the terms are relevant to the promotion, precise and enforceable.
Potential technical problems and other contingencies should also be addressed in contest rules, including in relation to the unavailability of prizes as disclosed, technical problems arising from the operation of the contest (e.g., computer, Internet or server issues) and other unforeseen events.
Some common contest rule related errors I see include: terms that are not relevant to a particular promotion; U.S. or international rules used for Canadian contests; contests that purport to apply to many jurisdictions where it is not clear that rules have been vetted for the laws of other countries or Quebec; and contests run with no rules at all (or rules that do not comply with Canadian requirements).
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW
In addition to the above, intellectual property issues can sometimes arise in the operation of contests. Some of the potential intellectual property (i.e., copyright, trade-mark, etc.) related issues that may need to be considered when running a contest include: whether a promoter owns the title for a contest; whether consents have been obtained for 3rd party marks, logos, photographs, etc. planned to be used for a promotion; including promoter copyright statements in contest rules; including language in rules granting a promoter the right to use original materials submitted by entrants (e.g., entry forms, photos, essays or other “consumer generated” content created and submitted by entrants, such as in skill based promotions); and representation and indemnification provisions protecting the sponsor where participants may not have rights to materials submitted for a promotion.
It is also important to note that some companies, such as Apple, have specific and in some cases quite restrictive policies regarding the use of products for prizing, use of images, marks or logos, etc.
CASL (ANTI-SPAM LEGISLATION)
Finally, with the coming into force of Canada’s new federal anti-spam law, contest promoters may need to consider the application and compliance with CASL (for an overview of CASL see: CASL).
CASL may apply where, for example, entrants are to be invited by e-mail to participate in a contest, for the follow up with entrants by e-mail or subsequent e-mail marketing (e.g., where a contest includes the right of the promoter to engage in subsequent marketing to entrants). As such, it is strongly recommended that contest promoters get some CASL advice prior to using e-mail or other electronic communications in contests and for electronic marketing more generally.
CANADIAN CONTEST LAW TIPS
The following is a list of some of the key tips (though not an exhaustive check-list) for operating a successful contest in Canada:
1. Take care to avoid the Criminal Code provisions governing illegal lotteries (e.g., provide a “no purchase necessary” entry option and skill element, such as a multiple-step mathematical question).
2. “Short rules” should include all Competition Act disclosure requirements for point-of-purchase materials.
3. Ensure that precise “long rules” are prepared, particularly anticipating potential contingencies (e.g., technical problems, etc.). Standard precedents, or copies of rules retrieved from the web, rarely address many of the details of a particular promotion. Like all law, your counsel should not only understand what each provision means, but it should be relevant to your particular promotion.
4. Ensure that none of the advertising or marketing materials are generally false or misleading (i.e., comply with the “general misleading advertising” sections of the Competition Act). In this regard, contests in Canada must comply with not only stand-alone contest provisions of the Competition Act (under section 74.06) but also with the general misleading advertising sections of the Act.
5. If contests are part of your company’s routine marketing, consider developing an internal check-list to ensure that all key legal requirements are met. (Plus this is not a bad way to check your external counsel’s or agency’s work!).
6. Ensure that all key contest elements are as clear and precise as possible (e.g., eligibility, how to enter and descriptions of the prize and odds of winning).
7. Ensure that Quebec legal requirements are met (or take care to make sure that eligibility is limited to Canadian residents, not including Quebec).
8. Consider whether consents are needed (and if necessary obtained) to reproduce 3rd party intellectual property (e.g., trade-marks, logos, etc.) or transfer ownership in contest materials (e.g., where contestants create original material as part of the contest or promotion).
9. Obtain U.S. legal advice if the contest will be open to U.S. residents.
11. Consider whether other competition or advertising law rules may apply (e.g., the deceptive prize notice or telemarketing provisions of the Competition Act, both of which can also apply to contests, depending on the circumstances).
12. CASL (anti-spam law): If using electronic communication for a contest (e.g., e-mail follow-ups, post-contest electronic marketing, contests run in conjunction with electronic surveys, etc.) consider whether Canada’s anti-spam law applies (and tailor the contest to comply).
I offer a full range of promotional contest legal services for compliance with the Competition Act, Criminal Code and other relevant laws. My services include: preparing contests to comply with relevant federal laws, drafting short and long contest rules and statutory disclosure, reviewing promotional contest marketing and advertising materials, preparing winner release documentation, and vetting contest materials for Canadian misleading advertising law compliance.
Need contest rules and forms for a Canadian Contest? I offer a selection of Canadian contest rules and forms for common types of Canadian contests. For more information see: Canadian contest forms.
For more information about my services: contact
For more regulatory updates follow me on Twitter: @CanadaAttorney