Categories

Archives


July 20, 2011

OVERVIEW

The Canadian Competition Act (the “Act”) contains both criminal and civil provisions prohibiting or regulating a range of activities that can arise in commercial dealings (e.g., in the context of distributor/customer relations, trade association activities and commercial agreements including intellectual property license agreements, joint venture and strategic alliance agreements and franchise agreements).

The criminal parts of the Act include provisions relating to criminal conspiracies (i.e., price-fixing, market allocation and output restriction agreements), bid-rigging, criminal misleading advertising, deceptive telemarketing and telemarketing.  Civil “reviewable matters” under the Act include abuse of dominance (monopolization), civil misleading advertising, refusal to deal, resale price maintenance and exclusive dealing, tied selling and marketing restriction.

PENALTIES

The potential penalties for contravention of the Act include fines of up to $25 million (and in some cases without limit – i.e., in the discretion of the court), imprisonment for up to 14 years, prohibition orders, civil fines up to $10 million and court orders to cease the conduct.

Directors and officers can also be liable under the Act.  In this regard, it is common for employees and directors and officers of companies to be involved both in Competition Bureau investigations and to be named as parties in competition law private actions.

COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS

Competition compliance programs are not mandatory under the Act, though can in certain cases be ordered by a court (for example, as part of a negotiated consent agreement or prohibition order).

A well-designed and effective compliance program can have many benefits for companies and trade associations (discussed below).  It is also more important now for companies to have effective compliance programs for several reasons including: (i) the recent enactment of new criminal conspiracy offences with a lower enforcement burden, (ii) increased penalties for criminal conspiracies (maximum fines of up to $25 million), misleading advertising (maximum “AMPs” of $10 million) and bid-rigging and (iii) the Bureau is more focused on enforcement under the current Commissioner than in the past.

BENEFITS OF AN EFFECTIVE COMPLIANCE PROGRAM

Some of the benefits of a credible and effective competition compliance program include:

Reducing the risk of contravening the criminal and civil provisions of the Act.

Identifying the boundaries of acceptable conduct.

Reducing costs in relation to investigations and proceedings.

Identifying circumstances when legal advice should be sought.

Detecting illegal conduct.

Potentially mitigating penalties in the event of an investigation.

Strengthening the goodwill and reputation of a company or organization.

Avoiding negative publicity as a result of an investigation or legal proceedings.

Reducing potential director and officer liability for contravention of the Act.

While a competition compliance policy will not automatically insulate a company or its directors and officers from potential criminal or civil liability under the Act, the Competition Bureau may give weight to a credible and effective compliance program in determining how to proceed in respect of a particular matter (e.g., determining whether to proceed with a more informal resolution of a case).

A credible competition compliance program may also act as a mitigating factor for the assessment of penalties under the Act or evaluating the availability of a due diligence defence under certain provisions of the Act.

KEY ELEMENTS

The Competition Bureau has recently issued a new Information Bulletin on Corporate Compliance Programs (the “Bulletin”).  The Bureau’s new Bulletin replaces its earlier Corporate Compliance Programs Bulletin issued in 1997.

The Bureau sets out five essential elements for an effective compliance program in the Bulletin:

1.  Senior management involvement and support. As senior management are required to exercise care, skill and diligence and act in the best interests of a company, they should identify the principal risks faced by a business and implement appropriate systems to manage such risk (including the adoption of compliance programs).

2.  Corporate compliance policies and procedures. The development of a corporate compliance program tailored to a business and relevant industry is critical to a program’s success (which should be periodically updated).

3.  Training and education.  A credible and effective compliance program should include ongoing training and education focused on personnel who are in a position to engage in conduct that may contravene the Act.

4.  Monitoring, auditing and reporting mechanisms. Monitoring, auditing and reporting mechanisms are in the Bureau’s view also essential to an effective compliance program to help prevent and detect violations of the Act.

5.  Consistent disciplinary procedures and incentives. Finally, consistent disciplinary procedures and initiatives demonstrate the seriousness of a company’s compliance with the Act and are important for deterrence purposes and as a reflection of a company’s policy against unlawful conduct.

TRADE ASSOCIATIONS

With respect to trade associations, the Bureau has emphasized the particular importance of adopting effective compliance programs:

“A [compliance] program also plays a crucial role for trade associations because trade associations face unique compliance issues.  Given that an association provides a forum where competitors collaborate on association activities, trade associations are exposed to greater risks of anti-competitive conduct.  A number of past Bureau cases have involved trade associations that were engaged in agreements to harm competition.  It is therefore critical that trade associations implement credible and effective programs with strict codes of ethics and conduct.  Such programs may allow trade associations and its members to avoid improper actions and to protect themselves from being used as a conduit for illegal activities.  They may also allow trade association members to fully benefit from the association’s activities while reducing the potential for inadvertent contraventions of the Acts.” (Competition Bureau, Corporate Compliance Programs Information Bulletin).

Given that associations in many if not most cases involve the interaction of direct competitors, it is important for associations to both implement an effective compliance program and for their senior management to be aware of the key association activities that can raise concerns.

For more about associations and competition law see:

Associations and Competition Law

COMPETITION/ANTITRUST LAW & ECONOMIC TERMS

For competition/antitrust definitions and terms see:

Antitrust Alphabet

COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS LINKS AND RESOURCES

Competition Bureau

Competition Bureau

Bulletins

Corporate Compliance Programs

Competition Bureau Fee and Service Standards Handbook for Written Opinions

____________________

We provide federal competition and foreign investment law services to clients across Canada and internationally.